Friday, September 14, 2007
September Newsletter Emailed to Subscribers
Read More...
[Source: LearnMoney.co.uk]
How To Use Fixed Odds Betting To Make Money In the Markets
Read More...
[Source: LearnMoney.co.uk]
May Newsletter Now Published Online
Read More...
[Source: LearnMoney.co.uk]
June Newsletter Now Published Online
Read More...
[Source: LearnMoney.co.uk]
Musicians - Great News - Interest Free Loans!
Read More...
[Source: LearnMoney.co.uk]
Why Binary Betting Should Be Part of Every Trader's Toolbox
Read More...
[Source: LearnMoney.co.uk]
An Interesting Approach To Constructing Investment Portfolios
Read More...
[Source: LearnMoney.co.uk]
Over 50s Bank Accounts - Better Deals Available Elsewhere
Read More...
[Source: LearnMoney.co.uk]
Automated Stop Losses In Spread Betting and Their Dangers
Read More...
[Source: LearnMoney.co.uk]
July Newsletter Now Published Online
Read More...
[Source: LearnMoney.co.uk]
August Newsletter Now Published Online
Read More...
[Source: LearnMoney.co.uk]
SCAM ALERT - Scam ? Another Fake Regulator RAOIM and Some More Scam Brokerages
Read More...
[Source: LearnMoney.co.uk]
Introduction to Technical Analysis - Part 1
Read More...
[Source: LearnMoney.co.uk]
Thursday, September 6, 2007
So What Really is a Share
Read More...
[Source: The Bullhunters Guide | Bullhunters Guide to the US Stock Market]
The 50 Highest Paid American Athletes
Sports Illustrated is out with their yearly Fortunate 50 list which ranks the highest paid athletes for the year. Tiger woods took the top spot by earning a whooping $111,941,827. Oscar De La Hoya was second, earning $55,000,000 and Phil Mickelson took home the third spot with $51,256,505 in earnings. The estimated totals used to compose the list include salary, winnings, bonuses, endorsements and appearances. Here is how the top 10 shook out:
- Tiger Woods, golf, $111,941,827
- Oscar De La Hoya, boxing, $55,000,000
- Phil Mickelson, golf, $51,256,505
- Shaquille O’Neal, NBA, $35,000,000
- Kobe Bryant, NBA, $33,718,750
- LeBron James, NBA, $30,828,089
- Kevin Garnett, NBA, $29,000,000
- Derek Jeter, MLB, $29,000,000
- Alex Rodriguez, MLB, $28,000,000
- Dale Earnhardt Jr., auto racing, $27,111,735
To see the full list, click here.
One thing that stands out is LeBron James’ endorsements which netted him $25,000,000. So if that figure remains, and his salary catches up to that of Kobe’s or Shaq’s, LeBron will earn over $40,000,000 a year and become the highest paid team sports athlete.
Another thing to note is the arrival of Michelle Wie to the list. The 17 year old golfer became the highest earning female athlete by earning $20,235,224. Over 96% of that total came from endorsements.
While the numbers these athletes rack up in the paycheck category are impressive, they are still dwarfed by that of Wall Street’s top earning traders.
Read More...
[Source: Stock Market Blog.com]
US Stock Market
Read More...
[Source: The Bullhunters Guide | Bullhunters Guide to the US Stock Market]
Treasury Bond Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs)
With Treasury Bonds being in the news lately I thought I’d take a look at what ETF options are available for investors wanting to take advantage of moves in the bond market. After some quick research, I found only two exchange traded funds in this category which have decent daily trading volume.
- iShares Lehman 20+ Year Treasury Bond - Ticker Symbol: TLT
- iShares Lehman 1-3 Year Treasury Bond - Ticker Symbol: SHY
For more info on these you can visit the iShares website.
The 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) only invests in bonds that mature in 20 years or more and thus is the more volatile fund of the two. TLT has traded in a range of 82.20 to 91.80 in the past 52 weeks. On the other hand, The 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHY) has traded in a narrow range of 79.26 to 80.60 in the same time period. Thus, the 20+ Year ETF is the best way to play the volatility in the bond market.
Keep in mind that both of these funds pay dividends each and every month so if you decide to short them you will need to pay the dividend out of your own pocket.
Read More...
[Source: Stock Market Blog.com]
SCAM ALERT - Scam ? Another Fake Regulator RAOIM and Some More Scam Brokerages
Read More...
[Source: LearnMoney.co.uk]
Daily Review. 31st August, 2007
Read More...
[Source: Russian Stock Market Blog]
Norilsk Nickel has wrapped up syndication of $3.5 bln loans to take over LionOre.
Read More...
[Source: Russian Stock Market Blog]
Rapper 50 Cent Nets $400 million from the sale of Glaceau
Hip Hop artist 50 cent, whose real name is Curtis Jackson, has reportedly received a $400 million paycheck after Coca-Cola purchased the company behind his energy drink Formula 50.
Glaceau, the company which produces Vitamin Water, was acquired in a $4.1 billion deal last Friday. 50 Cent became a shareholder in 2004 and had a 10% stake in the company when the deal was signed.
Another person profiting from the sale of Glaceau is New York Mets third basemen David Wright who had a 0.5% stake in the company (or $20 million based on the buyout price).
Read More...
[Source: Stock Market Blog.com]
In early market updates, blue chips kicked off to the upside.
Sergey Belov, Asset Manager, Finam Investment Company
Read More...
[Source: Russian Stock Market Blog]
Snowed in with the Academy in Queenstown
Read More...
[Source: The Bullhunters Guide | Bullhunters Guide to the US Stock Market]
In intraday market news, domestic equities have been on a rollercoaster ride for the second day in a row.
Sergey Dorogavtsev, Asset Manager, Finam Investment Company
Read More...
[Source: Russian Stock Market Blog]
Over 50s Bank Accounts - Better Deals Available Elsewhere
Read More...
[Source: LearnMoney.co.uk]
Watch Dan Rather Tonight on HDNet 8pm EST
We have great people who work hard to make great shows. Tonight's Dan Rather Reports is another great example. You can catch a Sneak Preview of the show here You can read Frazier Moore's AP story on the show here
This is not your basic "look what we found" 12 minute segment. This is exactly what we set out to do with Dan Rather Reports. We wanted to find stories, uncover the news and report it in the best way possible. Dan's show is normally 1 hour long. Not only will this story take up the full hour, but Dan asked for and got another 15 minutes to make sure we covered the entire story.
Fans of foes of Dan's, or of any story related to politics will assume there was some political motivation behind the story. There isn't. I will show you exactly where the story started with the following . There was nothing new to say until the following happened:
"A CRITICAL LEGAL DOCUMENT IN THE BATTLE OVER FLORIDA'S TOUCHSCREENS WAS FILED FAR FROM SARASOTA, HERE AT THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN MINNEAPOLIS, IN A CASE THAT ALMOST ONE EVEN KNOWS ABOUT.
THE CASE, BERGQUIST VERSUS HARTFORD CASUALTY, BEGAN TWO YEARS AGO. IT SEEMS AT FIRST A SIMPLE DISPUTE BETWEEN A POLICYHOLDER AND INSURANCE COMPANY OVER COVERAGE AND LIABILITY. BERGQUIST, THE COMPANY THAT MANUFACTURED THE SCREENS USED IN THE ES&S IVOTRONIC WAS SEEKING REIMBURSEMENT FOR COSTS INCURRED IN RECALLING AND REPLACING THOUSANDS OF POTENTIALLY DEFECTIVE TOUCH SCREENS, MOST IN VOTING MACHINES IN FLORIDA.
AN AFFIDAVIT IN THE CASE, RECENTLY FILED, LOOKS LIKE JUST ONE MORE DOCUMENT IN A MOUNTAIN OF COURT PAPERS. BUT THE AFFIDAVIT OF DR. PATRICIA DUNN, A FORMER MATERIAL SCIENTIST FOR THE BERGQUIST COMPANY, WAS A BOMBSHELL.
PATRICIA DUNN'S EXPERIMENTS AT BERGQUIST SUGGESTED THAT MORE SCREENS WOULD GO OUT OF CALIBRATION OVER TIME, ESPECIALLY IN HUMID PLACES.... LIKE FLORIDA.
ACCORDING TO DUNN, IN 2002 SHE URGED A RECALL OF MANY BERGQUIST SCREENS FROM MANILA...BUT COURT EXHIBITS SUGGEST IT WAS REPORTS IN 2003 OF SCREEN PROBLEMS IN LEE COUNTY, FLORIDA THAT WAS THE TIPPING POINT FOR MANAGEMENT AT BERGQUIST, ES&S AND PIVOT.
Thats the start of it. From there Dan will take you to the factories in Manilla where voting machines were made to show you why and how there will problems. He interviews the people involved who raised the issues, to no avail. Then he follows the problems from Manilla to Minnesota and beyond.
And thats just the start of the story.
check it out tonight at 8pm or 11pm EST
Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments
Read More...
[Source: Blog Maverick]
Retired to the Stock Market
Read More...
[Source: The Bullhunters Guide | Bullhunters Guide to the US Stock Market]
August Newsletter Now Published Online
Read More...
[Source: LearnMoney.co.uk]
13,433
Read More...
[Source: KARACHI STOCK MARKET NEWS]
The Internet Is still Dead and Boring
When people resort to personal comments. Its usually a good sign.
Among those I respect, there were a lot of great responses. Let me first say, my position on this has nothing to do with HDNet. I've not abandoned the net. In fact i have more than 100 RSS feeds and untold other sites Im involved with.
Ive been inundated with spam on Myspace. Used flicker. Used Digg for sourcing news and laughed at the unending ridiculousness of its posters. Used and posted to Youtube, Google Video, DailyMotion, Veoh, Flickr, Slideshare, used every bittorrent client, got bored with twitter after 7 minutes, signed up for other findme, find you, this is where I am, this is where you are, type app I could find, and the lists go on and on. I read techmeme, techcrunch, extremetech, and tons of other tech sites and I make a point to try every and any new site that seems the least bit plausible or interesting. I spend far far too much time on the net just to make sure I keep up and know whats going on.
Honestly, its just a bigger, more time consuming version on CompuServe Forums from back in the day (Find someone who participated in the OS/2 forums if you want to know about social networks). Only back then you didn't call People friends, they were just forum members.
I have a ton of Internet investments that you dont and wont know about.
i have loaded and used facebook apps and I have downloaded the API documentation and actually read it. I'm such an exciting guy, I downloaded Ruby on Rails and read the documentation as well. That's what Saturday Nights are for.
I have bought installed and integrated every imaginable wireless device in my house. I think its fun.
I have invested in and gotten involved with application development on Facebook. Had a serious discussion with Facebook about the revenue opportunities they could achieve if they would license their API for full scale commercial applications on other websites. For example, to me, it would be an interesting and potentially explosive business move for Yahoo to license the Facebook API for their Panama platform. I think the beauty of Facebook is that people for the first time have defined and opened up the "database of their lives". Which if integrated into an advertising platform like Panama would allow advertisers to truly personalize ads, rather than algorithmically present ads. To me it was an interesting conversation.
I think it could change the way advertising is handled on the net. Each user could have the option to publish certain fields/objects which could be replicated/peered to the licensees of the API and then integrated Into the ad serving application. When the user showed up on the licensee site, say Yahoo Finance, the ad server could present a contextual ad chosen based on the published objects within the context of the Yahoo content.
Its one of many good or bad ideas that are feasible because the net is the plain vanilla boring, never really changing platform that it is.
Guess what. When things go from exciting to stable and boring in the technology world, that's a good thing.
Call me a cynic. I feel the same way about Personal Computers. Faster processors dint do it for me. Installing Vista was a disaster till I read a copy of CPU magazine and used the OS mods they had in there to clean the junk up. Its sad but true that a 25 year old platform is more volatile than the Internet. It still takes so long to boot that for the first time since I had a Mac in 1990 I bought a Macbook and junked my Vista Laptop. My time is at a premium. The days of being concerned that if I bought a Mac there might be some apps that I could use but the wouldn't run on the Mac are long gone. Not because the Mac has an Intel processor, but because I cant really think of any new off the shelf software that I would get excited to buy.
Beyond Office and email, I spend a ton of time on the net. That boring platform that ain't gonna change and is dead in the excitement category.
What do I get excited about ?
I'm excited about Virtual Machines, as I have written before, and the changes and impact they could have on all of us. I get fired up about the continuing decline in flash and hard drive prices. Its amazing to me after all these years of watching drive prices fall that I can buy more than 500gigs of drive for under 100 bucks. That i can buy a 16gig flash drive for not much more. and it still pisses me off that i have to deal with file size limits that require me to manage my email files when I back them up.
And of course I'm excited about the HDTV space and whats happening there. Maybe some people dont think peoples media consumption patterns change when 70" HDTVs are installed in their homes, I do.
Which brings me to why I said that "The Net is Dead and Boring"
The best way to sum up how I feel about the excitement and opportunities on the net compared to the many other personal and corporate technology options out there is to use a Yogi Berra quote.
"Nobody goes there anymore. It's too crowded"
When everyone is looking for gold in the same river, the best opportunities are somewhere else.
But hey, that's just me.Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments
Read More...
[Source: Blog Maverick]
12,787
Read More...
[Source: KARACHI STOCK MARKET NEWS]
12,693
Read More...
[Source: KARACHI STOCK MARKET NEWS]
Federal budget surplus dropped to Rub 1,076 bln in January-June 2007.
Read More...
[Source: Russian Stock Market Blog]
Recent Dividends - II
Read More...
[Source: KARACHI STOCK MARKET NEWS]
EDTM to raise GDP growth forecast to 7.2-7.4% by end of September.
Read More...
[Source: Russian Stock Market Blog]
Central Bank Ruble Exchange Rates
1 British Pound Sterling 51.6650
1000 Belorussian Rouble 11.9143
10 Danish Krone 47.0292
1 US Dollar 25.6262
1 EURO 35.0233
100 Iceland Krona 40.4709
100 Kazakh Tenge 20.2803
1 Canadian Dollar 24.2191
10 China Yuan 33.9555
10 Norwegian Krone 44.0525
1 SDR 39.2258
1 Singapore Dollar 16.8361
1 New Turkey Lira 19.6144
10 Ukrainian Hryvnia 50.9528
10 Swedish Krona 37.2983
1 Swiss Franc 21.3072
100 Japanese Yen 22.0459
Read More...
[Source: Russian Stock Market Blog]
12,228 - minor pullback
Read More...
[Source: KARACHI STOCK MARKET NEWS]
13,012
Read More...
[Source: KARACHI STOCK MARKET NEWS]
13,665 - pullback
Read More...
[Source: KARACHI STOCK MARKET NEWS]
Central Bank Ruble Exchange Rates
1 British Pound Sterling 51.6674
1000 Belorussian Rouble 11.9020
10 Danish Krone 46.8034
1 US Dollar 25.5982
1 EURO 34.8571
100 Iceland Krona 39.8788
100 Kazakh Tenge 20.7147
1 Canadian Dollar 24.2936
10 China Yuan 33.9027
10 Norwegian Krone 43.9017
1 SDR 39.2326
1 Singapore Dollar 16.8033
1 New Turkey Lira 19.6441
10 Ukrainian Hryvnia 50.8911
10 Swedish Krona 37.1381
1 Swiss Franc 21.1818
100 Japanese Yen 22.0826
Read More...
[Source: Russian Stock Market Blog]
July Newsletter Now Published Online
Read More...
[Source: LearnMoney.co.uk]
Trading Options
Read More...
[Source: The Bullhunters Guide | Bullhunters Guide to the US Stock Market]
Programming for HDTV
There are webisodes coming at us from every direction. Vuguru has done a great job with original programming for the web. Every cable and broadcast network it seems is doing companion programming on the web for their TV shows. Leverage the abilities of the PC and the net is an oft heard theme wtth content creators. And who can forget user generated content coming to us from every corner of the universe capable of everything and anything short of world peace !
There is original programming for phones and PDAs.coming from every direction. Discovery is doing 14 original series as are any number of content creators. The programming is being designed for the features of the device it will be played on . Phone viewers can respond in any number of ways. Content can take advantage of features of the device OS, whether it be Zune , IPod or IPhone , whatever. They may be as simple as integrating cover art rof CDs ot full interactivity and interaction.
Then of course there is programming for compatible TV. What is compatible TV ? Its programming that without alteration , looks the same on any and every TV you play it on. A color episode of Gunsmoke will play back from a VCR, DVD or TIVO pretty much the same way as an epsiode of Heroes on Grandmas old console as it will on a brand new 50" HDTV . You never have to ask the question, "Will this work"
No one in the last 50 plus years has ever programmed content differently for different types of TVs. They programmed content "For TV"
That made sense in an analog world. It makes no sense to me in a digital world. Which is a key reason why we started HDNet of course.
But if I really think about TV these days, it actually makes more sense that traditional programmers program for compatible tv. Content creators have no choice but to do any differentiated programming on non TV platforms. Its about the economics.
There are 111.4 mm TV Households as of 2007 . There are more than 2.4 TVs per household. Thats about 270mm TVs in this country. Every single one of those TVs is critically important to content creators. They need every viewer they can get in order to sell ads and subscriptions to their programming.
If they were to program to the unique features and capabilities of the 44pct of households that own 52.5mm HDTV owners and are capable of receiving an HDTV signal, they would be excluding the viewers of about 240 mm compatible TVs as revenue sources (remember, hdtv owners can own and get an HD signal on more than 1 set which is why the numbers dont seem to add up). In this era of fast forwarding through commercials and other attacks on traditional tv viewership, there is no company of any size that can afford to ignore 240mm TVs.
Except for HDNet.
Our business is bullt on on ONLY programming for those households that have HDTVs and receive HD signals. We create programming that takes full advantage of the widescreen, resolution, color palette, 5.1 or better sound, digital connectivity and more to make great original programming better. Which is why our viewers always tell us that our picture quality always looks much better than others
But this post isn't to brag about HDNet and HDNet Movies being the only 2 networks that program exclusively for HDTV. Its to get feedback on what type of programming works well on future HDTVs but not so well on compatible TV
HDTVs are much like PCs, they get bigger, better and cheaper year after year. This past year saw the biggest increase in the size of the average TV purchased, EVER . The size of the average HDTV is going to continue to grow.
So the real programming question is this.
What can you show on a 50, 60, 70" or larger screen that you cant show on a traditional, compatible TV ?
The first type of programming that came to our minds is music concerts. Music concerts have never worked really well on compatible TV. Even the biggest of names tend to disappoint in terms of number of viewers. Its easy to understand why. The fidelity of sound coming from your analog set, even if its stereo, is not going to be that great.
On the flipside, a music concert on a big screen ,with 5.1 sound, particularly if its connected through the digital output to a nice set of speakers (something hard to find from an analog set) can be a great home experience.
To take advantage of this unique differentiation, we licensed every great concert that we could find and continue to do so. . Then we devoted an entire day of our programming, Sunday to concerts. We have shot, created or licensed more than 150 concerts and I dont know how many more music shows including our long running original True Music show and we play them all day, every Sunday.
That was the first step, what should be our next ?
What programming should be exclusive to HDTV viewers and not shown on regular TV ?
Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments
Read More...
[Source: Blog Maverick]
Politics
When I vote in any local or state election, I vote for the candidate who I think will do the least. Not the least of anything specific, just the least amount of everything. The perfect candidate for me would be one that would walk around kissing babies. I think we have enough state and federals. We have 200+ years of making local and state laws. That's enough.
When I vote in Presidential elections, I tend to vote for 3rd party candidates simply because anything that might prompt strength in a 3rd party could weaken the two main parties. Otherwise, I vote for the candidate that I think will do the least.
Here is why.
Take a look at domestic car manufacturers. How difficult is it going to be for them to regain the lead in their industry ? It won't be easy. Nor will it be easy to do in a mere 4 years. Now if its very difficult to pick the right person to turn around a major corporation, how difficult is it to pick the right President ? The car companies get to interview anyone they want. Voters typically only have choices presented to us based not on their abilities to lead or improve the country, but on their ability to get elected . And that's not a very big list.
The 2 major parties seem to put having their party in power over having the best possible person in that position. I haven't become a big fan of that approach.
Its not that the nominated candidates can't or won't be great Presidents, it's just that we don't really get our choice of the best candidates. But that's not the biggest issue. That's not why I vote for the candidate that does the least.
The reason is that the United States has gotten so big, in terms of population, diverse groups and economy, I just dint think ANYONE can truly set a course of action that is anything more than a guess.
It doesn't matter if its a Democrat or a Republican. It doesn't matter if its a social or economic program. Every President has his projects that he promotes and promises to implement. We see and hear all about it as its being discussed and voted on. If it passes, we see and hear about its initial implementation, but then it just becomes one more program in an awful big book of programs. Did you ever wonder how many programs have been implemented every 4 years ?
The same applies to laws. Its part of a platform. It becomes law at some point after election, then put in the legal system as one more law. I personally think we have too many laws.
Too many programs and too many laws. There are so many passed, that when something good happens in the economy, and thanks to good old American innovation something good usually does happen to the economy during every administration, that the administration gives credit to one of their programs for whatever good is occurring at the time
President Clinton took all the credit when the Internet Boom boosted the economy and let all the blame fall on President Bush when it collapsed. President Bush took all the credit as the economy grew and grew as interest rates fell, until sub prime undercut that growth. If the economy doesn't rebound from this sub prime mess, I'm sure he will pass the blame on to the next President. In reality, neither President really had anything to do with things going right or wrong. Its the American People stupid.
This isn't a criticism of either President, or any President, it's a reflection of what I believe, which is that when it comes to economic and social policy the best any candidate or President can do is guess. They turn to the smartest people they trust, ask them for advice on what to do and hope it works. That's not as big a problem when it comes to turning around or building the results of a corporation, that's a huge problem to me when it comes to our nation.
Since most policies are just guesses, I would rather they just do nothing. There is no question their hearts are in the right place and they want to do the right thing, but the reality is that every single program that is supposed to have a major impact on our country is nothing more than a guess.
What I would love to see is a candidate who says he/she is going to start removing laws and programs. Give me a candidate who's primary platform is to spend 4 years removing federal programs and laws. If it was a law or program worth anything the states or local municipalities will find much more creative ways to make them work.
I know its far easier said than done, but could it be any harder to remove an existing law or program than it would be to define, develop and implement another on top of what we already have in place ? Our government is so big, getting it to move in any direction is an incredibly difficult thing to do.
So if you want my vote in 2008, don't tell me what you are going to add, tell me what you are going to remove. Tell me how you are going to simplify the government. That's how you get my vote.
And although its not exactly in context, but i didnt know where else i could put it, I decided to post it here. This is one of my favorite all time Presidential quotes, but I'm not going to tell you who said it.
"We are not afraid to entrust the American people with
unpleasant facts, foreign ideas, alien philosophies, and
competitive values. For a nation that is afraid to let
its people judge the truth and falsehood in an openmarket
is a nation that is afraid of its people."
And 1 more thing, because of the inevitable crazy comments that will come from the comment bombers from left and right websites, I reserve the right to turn off comments, quickly
Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments
Read More...
[Source: Blog Maverick]
Vimpelcom reports 84% upsurge in Q207 net profit.
Read More...
[Source: Russian Stock Market Blog]
In intraday market updates, domestic plays kicked off the week with modest gains.
Sergey Belov, Asset Manager, Finam Investment Company
Read More...
[Source: Russian Stock Market Blog]
12,040
Read More...
[Source: KARACHI STOCK MARKET NEWS]
Tech Stocks
Read More...
[Source: The Bullhunters Guide | Bullhunters Guide to the US Stock Market]
Me and Bill OReilly
From: "Watters, Jesse" <Jesse.Watters@FOXNEWS.COM>
To: <Mark.Cuban@dallasmavs.com>
Cc: <mark@hd.net>
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 13:14:55 -0400
Subject: o'reilly factor request
> Mr. Cuban,
>
> The Factor will be doing a segment this evening on Redacted...which, as
> you know, depicts US atrocities in Iraq. The director says the the
> depicted rape is "the reality" of what is happening in that country.
> Of all of the schools that are being built, the medical care being
> supplied, and the security that our soldiers have been providing to
> Iraqi neighborhoods...do you agree that a few random and horrific
> crimes represent the norm of what is going on in that newly liberated
> country? and what exactly was it about the film that made you want to
> produce it?
>
> Thanks
>
> Jesse Watters
> The O'Reilly Factor
> Fox News
> 212-301-3404
>
| From: | "Mark Cuban" |
| To: | "Watters, Jesse" |
| Cc: | mark@hd.net |
| Date: | 09/04/2007 12:55 PM |
| Subject: | Re: o'reilly factor request |
No, it doesnt represent the norm and the movie doesnt say it represents
the norm. Seperate the self promotion of Brian Depalma from the movie. The
movie is fully pro Troops. The hero of the movie is a soldier who stands
up for what is right in the face of adversity.
Maybe Bill can attempt to be fair and balanced and actually see the movie
before he thinks he knows what he is talking about.
And this is one of many movies we produce. I actually have seen it and
think it is an amazing movie. But to answer your question, I didnt read
the script or know all that much about it before we greenlit it. As we do
with several big name directors, we give them carte blanche in producing
their movies.
And to pre empt some of the stupidity coming from bloggers, I am fully Pro
Troops, Pro America. I think that the concept that the enemy will see
these films and use it as motivation is total nonsense. We have no plans
of translating these movies to arabic or other middle eastern languages.
Nor will we provide batteries or electricity for them to watch bootleg
DVDs as some zealots have suggested online.
And no , I am not involved in Loose Change. No I didnt finance it. No I
didnt plan to have it translated to multiple languages as Mr Oreilly
claimed on air. His command of the facts is truly abysmal.
What other lies has Bill spread that I can dispel ?
Oh, as far as other movies we have distributed, we released Voices of
Iraq, a movie whose PR campaign was financed by Republicans right before
the 2004 election. You may have caught my comments about this very much
pro Iraq movie that "this is a movie everyone should see before the election"
And maybe Bill can do something that is truly fair and balanced and put in
a plug for WWW.fallenpatriotfund.org . A fund I started right after the
war started. We provide funding for soldiers in need. To date we have
given 2.5mm dollars in grants. 100pct of the money goes to the troops, not
a single penny is spent on overhead or expenses. I cover those myself.
Oh, and I dont know how bill feels about No End in Sight, but we
distributed that movie as well.
Thats my feedback for Mr Bill
m
I didnt forward what is below to them, but i couldnt resist adding it below, it is the commentary criticizing me for Voices of Iraq. Just to show im equally hated by zealots on both sides. And to answer the question of why we distribute or get involved with politically charged movies ? Because I am a zealot that truly believes what JFK said and that I quoted in my last blog post. To paraphase, "A country afraid of the marketplace of ideas is a country afraid of its people". Its really easy to hate, its really hard to think issues through on their own merits. Anything that makes people think about issues is a good thing. I don't take sides, Diversity of information makes for more informed perspective and decisions.
Which leads to my position on the Iraqi War. I hate that thousands of our troops have died. It sickens me to think of how their families must feel and every single day I wake up I say thank you to them, as I thank all those who have come before them for their sacrifices to make this country so great and to give me the opportunity to live the life I have and enjoy my family. I have never, nor will I ever take for granted the liberties we have in this country
That said, I don't agree or disagree with the war because I don't know enough. There isn't enough information available to me to take a position beyond hoping that it runs its course very very quickly and our troops return home safely as soon as it is viable.
And to anyone who has ever questioned my patriotism or love for this country, fuck you.
A Dubious Doc
By Eartha Melzer
Just before the election, a film about Iraq hit art house theaters around the country. Voices of Iraq claimed to be a groundbreaking film in which "150 DV cameras [are] distributed across Iraq for the Iraqi people to show the world who they are and what Iraq will be."
The results? People seem happy that Saddam is gone and optimistic that, if the United States stays in Iraq, democracy will prevail. They seem unafraid of bombs going off nearby. People say Saddam funded al Qaeda. Former Iraqi political prisoners are shown laughing off the stories of prisoner abuse at Abu Ghraib-what Arab man wouldn't want a female American soldier to play with his penis?
The film begins with shaky handheld footage but the production values increase dramatically as talk turns to the horrors perpetrated by Saddam Hussein-extended sequences of beatings and dismemberment obviously shot using a tripod not supplied by the producers of this film.
So how was this film made?
Voices of Iraq was promoted as a project in which "thousands of ordinary Iraqis become filmmakers" as the cameras are passed hand to hand and-amazingly-all returned to the filmmakers. But Archie Drury, the Gulf War vet and actor who went to Iraq with the cameras, told me that he actually shot some of the footage himself.
Drury also said that the Iraq Foundation was "extremely helpful" to him as he tried to figure out how to get around and who to give the cameras to. The foundation also supplied the torture footage.
The Iraq Foundation, based in Washington, is funded by the State Department and the National Endowment for Democracy.
Not surprisingly, Drury got uncommon access to Iraqis and Iraqi leaders favored by the U.S. government. Among the notables interviewed, but not identified, is Sharif Ali, the cousin of Iraq's last king. Drury also interviewed a Sheik Aku Bezei, a man he says was the most powerful tribal leader in Fallujah. On November 6, a Sheik Bezei was killed for collaborating with American forces.
Drury says that his commanding general from Desert Storm put him in touch with General Mattis, fighting in the Sunni Triangle, and General Amos of the Air Wing, and that he exchanged e-mails with these generals as he planned his trip.
In an interview in Movie Maker magazine, another of the film's producers, Martin Kunnert, said: "Getting a theatrical release for a documentary film is still rare. We lucked out in that our distributor, Magnolia Pictures, [which also put out Control Room and Capturing the Friedmans] was eager to get the film in theaters before the presidential election."
A call to Magnolia Pictures in New York was answered by a man who, lowering his voice when asked about Voices of Iraq, whispered, "Nobody here wanted to release this and we didn't do any of the promotion on it. [Mark] Cuban steamrolled us on this." (Cuban owns Magnolia Pictures, the Dallas Mavericks and much more.)
Jeff Riechert, the Magnolia Pictures contact for Voices of Iraq, said that while his company is technically distributing the film, Manning, Selvage & Lee (MS&L) is coordinating the publicity. MS&L has the public affairs contract for the U.S. Army. The firm's revamp of the Army's image with the reality TV-style "Army of One" ad campaign is credited with enabling the Army to meet its recruiting goals after a long slump. According to MS&L Managing Director Joe Gleason, he and his colleagues also deliver key targeted messages about the war in Iraq to specific constituencies.
Was the left-leaning art house crowd one of those constituencies? Is the government hiring documentary filmmakers to propagandize the U.S. population?
Nobody involved with the film is willing to say who initially put up the money for the film or how they ended up represented by the Army's PR firm.
On November 13, as Marines stormed Fallujah, the Marines' Birthday Ball in San Francisco honored Drury for his work on Voices of Iraq, for "going back and living up to the standard of a Marine."
Eartha MelzerPermalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | CommentsRead More...
[Source: Blog Maverick]
Components of the DJIA
Read More...
[Source: The Bullhunters Guide | Bullhunters Guide to the US Stock Market]
Solution for the Real Estate Market ? Take Your House Public ?
Thats a polite way of saying that I'm not a details guy.
I mention this because as they say, "The Devil is in the Details", and I have no idea how to make happen what I'm about to propose. Nor do I know if there are specific laws or common sense "rules of the marketplace" that make this idea just plain stupid. Who knows. What I do know is that I'm curious about whether this would work and there is no better way to open an idea to criticism or support than by posting it on my blog. So here goes.
In the residential real estate world, the concept of buying a house is simple. You pick the house, negotiate a price, then agree to a payment arrangement.
The payment arrangement options are pretty straightforward.
You can pay for it with cash.
You can borrow money to pay for whatever amount that you cant or choose not to pay on the house. The payment terms are then set between you and the lender
This has worked well for a long time. A successful purchase of the house can be quickly defined as being able to make the payments you have committed to make, under the terms you have agreed to, until the house is paid off, all while gaining the utility of living in the house.
The problem with this approach is that when things go wrong and you can't make the payments the "solutions" are very binary.
1. You find a way to make your lender happy.
2. Your house is sold in an effort to satisfy your debt to the lender.
The binary nature of residential real estate financing also lends itself to being an attractive market for "sharks". We dont call the houses we live in "assets", we call them homes. They are very personal and important to us. Which in turn clouds our judgement. People who are at risk of losing their homes get desperate and take measures that aren't necessarily in their best interests just to save their homes and their families from grief.
There has to be a better way to protect homebuyers on the downside.
Lets contrast the financing process of individual homebuyers with funding in the business world. Businesses have any number of ways of raising capital for corporate purposes but they basically can be boiled down to two:
They can raise money via debt.
They can raise money via equity sale.
Debt resolution in the business world is just as binary as it is in residential real estate. If you can't pay the debt, you get foreclosed on and everyone probably goes home unhappy.
Which is exactly why , rather than borrowing money, most startups and growing businesses turn to the equity sale of some percentage of their company to raise capital. Need confirmation of this ? Look at the number of bonds available on national exchanges vs the number of stocks for sale on exchanges . The number of stocks is far greater than bonds and thats on the listed exchanges. Throw in the OTC and Pink Sheet markets and the numbers dwarf debt offerings even more dramatically.
Which leads to the question of...
Why can't home owners sell some percentage of equity in their homes on a listed exchange ? Why can't I
"Take My House Public ?"
Why not create a market or exchange where homeowners can sell equity in their homes ?
The rules could be very eimple
1. The house is appraised by a company approved by the exchange that lists the houses.
2. "Shares" are set with a Par Value of 10pct of the appraised value. For a 100k dollar house, there are 10 shares potentially available. However at no point in time can more than 40pct of the "shares" in a home be sold. We dont want the opportunity for "hostile takeovers"
3. The price of the shares will of course be set by the market. In a hot market it will be set above par, in a tough market like today, it will sell below Par.
4. All Proceeds from the sale of shares MUST be used to pay down any debt on the home.
This is the key element of this approach. By selling equity in a home, the buyer gets an asset based security that will move up and down with the market. If this market is big enough, there should be enough liquidity to move in and out of positions.
The seller receives cash that can be used to pay down the debt and thereby reduce his/her monthly payments. The seller loses a part of the upside if the market for the home improves and prices go up, but thats a small price to pay for not going into foreclosure.
Beyond creating liquidity options for individuals in the housing market, which i think is a good thing, I think this will also reduce the volatility in the market. Despite the best efforts of the residential Real Estate industry, no one ever really knows what their house is worth until you try to sell it. This exchange listing approach will certainly make for better information available for the market, which in turn will also reduce the volatility.
It will also increase the options of homeowners who have paid off their homes to acquire capital for personal uses. If a homeowner has completely paid off his/her home and wants to raise money for whatever purpose, a vacation, a car, education, whatever, rather than taking on debt , they could get their home appraised, have the
option of selling equity in my home that I would not be obligated to pay back. An option that would create a significant flow of capital back into the hands of consumers
How can this actually come together ?
It wouldn't be easy. It would probably take the country's biggest banks working together to create an exchange that develops the public market for home equity one city or region at a time. They would have to identify a means to safely set values so that Post IPO price the share pricing was stable. There would have to be provisions set for what happened when a home was sold. Shareholders would have to be paid their share of the salesprice upon closing.
There are thousands of things that i haven't thought of that would make or break this idea, but I think at its most basic, the concept is sound. However one thing I am sure of, this approach would reduce the Boom Bust cycles of residential real estate and the dramatic impact they have on our economy
Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments
Read More...
[Source: Blog Maverick]
Daily Review. 5th September, 2007
Read More...
[Source: Russian Stock Market Blog]
Bullhunter Discussion
Read More...
[Source: The Bullhunters Guide | Bullhunters Guide to the US Stock Market]
14,202
Read More...
[Source: KARACHI STOCK MARKET NEWS]
Musicians - Great News - Interest Free Loans!
Read More...
[Source: LearnMoney.co.uk]
Central Bank Ruble Exchange Rates
1 British Pound Sterling 51.8462
1000 Belorussian Rouble 11.9284
10 Danish Krone 47.0164
1 US Dollar 25.6639
1 EURO 35.0210
100 Iceland Krona 39.7336
100 Kazakh Tenge 20.8684
1 Canadian Dollar 24.3745
10 China Yuan 34.0199
10 Norwegian Krone 44.3506
1 SDR 39.2617
1 Singapore Dollar 16.7924
1 New Turkey Lira 19.6282
10 Ukrainian Hryvnia 51.0217
10 Swedish Krona 37.3223
1 Swiss Franc 21.2872
100 Japanese Yen 22.2391
Read More...
[Source: Russian Stock Market Blog]
12,708
Read More...
[Source: KARACHI STOCK MARKET NEWS]
Why Binary Betting Should Be Part of Every Trader's Toolbox
Read More...
[Source: LearnMoney.co.uk]
Daily Review. 5th September, 2007
Read More...
[Source: Russian Stock Market Blog]
Drugstore chain 36.6 reports H107 IAS net loss of $16.9 mln.
Read More...
[Source: Russian Stock Market Blog]
Central Bank Ruble Exchange Rates
1 British Pound Sterling 51.5330
1000 Belorussian Rouble 11.9457
10 Danish Krone 46.8315
1 US Dollar 25.6997
1 EURO 34.8951
100 Iceland Krona 39.7091
100 Kazakh Tenge 20.8494
1 Canadian Dollar 24.3969
10 China Yuan 34.0290
10 Norwegian Krone 44.0811
1 SDR 39.3216
1 Singapore Dollar 16.8203
1 New Turkey Lira 19.7250
10 Ukrainian Hryvnia 51.1050
10 Swedish Krona 37.1227
1 Swiss Franc 21.1834
100 Japanese Yen 22.1836
Read More...
[Source: Russian Stock Market Blog]
12,666 - heading for 12,950 ?
Read More...
[Source: KARACHI STOCK MARKET NEWS]
In early market updates, blue chips kicked off to the upside.
Sergey Belov, Asset Manager, Finam Investment Company
Read More...
[Source: Russian Stock Market Blog]
Wednesday, September 5, 2007
Daily Review. 4th September, 2007
Read More...
[Source: Russian Stock Market Blog]
12,393 - heading for 12,500 ?
Read More...
[Source: KARACHI STOCK MARKET NEWS]
Tuesday, September 4, 2007
Me and Bill OReilly
From: "Watters, Jesse" <Jesse.Watters@FOXNEWS.COM>
To: <Mark.Cuban@dallasmavs.com>
Cc: <mark@hd.net>
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 13:14:55 -0400
Subject: o'reilly factor request
> Mr. Cuban,
>
> The Factor will be doing a segment this evening on Redacted...which, as
> you know, depicts US atrocities in Iraq. The director says the the
> depicted rape is "the reality" of what is happening in that country.
> Of all of the schools that are being built, the medical care being
> supplied, and the security that our soldiers have been providing to
> Iraqi neighborhoods...do you agree that a few random and horrific
> crimes represent the norm of what is going on in that newly liberated
> country? and what exactly was it about the film that made you want to
> produce it?
>
> Thanks
>
> Jesse Watters
> The O'Reilly Factor
> Fox News
> 212-301-3404
>
| From: | "Mark Cuban" |
| To: | "Watters, Jesse" |
| Cc: | mark@hd.net |
| Date: | 09/04/2007 12:55 PM |
| Subject: | Re: o'reilly factor request |
No, it doesnt represent the norm and the movie doesnt say it represents
the norm. Seperate the self promotion of Brian Depalma from the movie. The
movie is fully pro Troops. The hero of the movie is a soldier who stands
up for what is right in the face of adversity.
Maybe Bill can attempt to be fair and balanced and actually see the movie
before he thinks he knows what he is talking about.
And this is one of many movies we produce. I actually have seen it and
think it is an amazing movie. But to answer your question, I didnt read
the script or know all that much about it before we greenlit it. As we do
with several big name directors, we give them carte blanche in producing
their movies.
And to pre empt some of the stupidity coming from bloggers, I am fully Pro
Troops, Pro America. I think that the concept that the enemy will see
these films and use it as motivation is total nonsense. We have no plans
of translating these movies to arabic or other middle eastern languages.
Nor will we provide batteries or electricity for them to watch bootleg
DVDs as some zealots have suggested online.
And no , I am not involved in Loose Change. No I didnt finance it. No I
didnt plan to have it translated to multiple languages as Mr Oreilly
claimed on air. His command of the facts is truly abysmal.
What other lies has Bill spread that I can dispel ?
Oh, as far as other movies we have distributed, we released Voices of
Iraq, a movie whose PR campaign was financed by Republicans right before
the 2004 election. You may have caught my comments about this very much
pro Iraq movie that "this is a movie everyone should see before the election"
And maybe Bill can do something that is truly fair and balanced and put in
a plug for WWW.fallenpatriotfund.org . A fund I started right after the
war started. We provide funding for soldiers in need. To date we have
given 2.5mm dollars in grants. 100pct of the money goes to the troops, not
a single penny is spent on overhead or expenses. I cover those myself.
Oh, and I dont know how bill feels about No End in Sight, but we
distributed that movie as well.
Thats my feedback for Mr Bill
m
I didnt forward what is below to them, but i couldnt resist adding it below, it is the commentary criticizing me for Voices of Iraq. Just to show im equally hated by zealots on both sides. And to answer the question of why we distribute or get involved with politically charged movies ? Because I am a zealot that truly believes what JFK said and that I quoted in my last blog post. To paraphase, "A country afraid of the marketplace of ideas is a country afraid of its people". Its really easy to hate, its really hard to think issues through on their own merits. Anything that makes people think about issues is a good thing. I don't take sides, Diversity of information makes for more informed perspective and decisions.
Which leads to my position on the Iraqi War. I hate that thousands of our troops have died. It sickens me to think of how their families must feel and every single day I wake up I say thank you to them, as I thank all those who have come before them for their sacrifices to make this country so great and to give me the opportunity to live the life I have and enjoy my family. I have never, nor will I ever take for granted the liberties we have in this country
That said, I don't agree or disagree with the war because I don't know enough. There isn't enough information available to me to take a position beyond hoping that it runs its course very very quickly and our troops return home safely as soon as it is viable.
And to anyone who has ever questioned my patriotism or love for this country, fuck you.
A Dubious Doc
By Eartha Melzer
Just before the election, a film about Iraq hit art house theaters around the country. Voices of Iraq claimed to be a groundbreaking film in which "150 DV cameras [are] distributed across Iraq for the Iraqi people to show the world who they are and what Iraq will be."
The results? People seem happy that Saddam is gone and optimistic that, if the United States stays in Iraq, democracy will prevail. They seem unafraid of bombs going off nearby. People say Saddam funded al Qaeda. Former Iraqi political prisoners are shown laughing off the stories of prisoner abuse at Abu Ghraib-what Arab man wouldn't want a female American soldier to play with his penis?
The film begins with shaky handheld footage but the production values increase dramatically as talk turns to the horrors perpetrated by Saddam Hussein-extended sequences of beatings and dismemberment obviously shot using a tripod not supplied by the producers of this film.
So how was this film made?
Voices of Iraq was promoted as a project in which "thousands of ordinary Iraqis become filmmakers" as the cameras are passed hand to hand and-amazingly-all returned to the filmmakers. But Archie Drury, the Gulf War vet and actor who went to Iraq with the cameras, told me that he actually shot some of the footage himself.
Drury also said that the Iraq Foundation was "extremely helpful" to him as he tried to figure out how to get around and who to give the cameras to. The foundation also supplied the torture footage.
The Iraq Foundation, based in Washington, is funded by the State Department and the National Endowment for Democracy.
Not surprisingly, Drury got uncommon access to Iraqis and Iraqi leaders favored by the U.S. government. Among the notables interviewed, but not identified, is Sharif Ali, the cousin of Iraq's last king. Drury also interviewed a Sheik Aku Bezei, a man he says was the most powerful tribal leader in Fallujah. On November 6, a Sheik Bezei was killed for collaborating with American forces.
Drury says that his commanding general from Desert Storm put him in touch with General Mattis, fighting in the Sunni Triangle, and General Amos of the Air Wing, and that he exchanged e-mails with these generals as he planned his trip.
In an interview in Movie Maker magazine, another of the film's producers, Martin Kunnert, said: "Getting a theatrical release for a documentary film is still rare. We lucked out in that our distributor, Magnolia Pictures, [which also put out Control Room and Capturing the Friedmans] was eager to get the film in theaters before the presidential election."
A call to Magnolia Pictures in New York was answered by a man who, lowering his voice when asked about Voices of Iraq, whispered, "Nobody here wanted to release this and we didn't do any of the promotion on it. [Mark] Cuban steamrolled us on this." (Cuban owns Magnolia Pictures, the Dallas Mavericks and much more.)
Jeff Riechert, the Magnolia Pictures contact for Voices of Iraq, said that while his company is technically distributing the film, Manning, Selvage & Lee (MS&L) is coordinating the publicity. MS&L has the public affairs contract for the U.S. Army. The firm's revamp of the Army's image with the reality TV-style "Army of One" ad campaign is credited with enabling the Army to meet its recruiting goals after a long slump. According to MS&L Managing Director Joe Gleason, he and his colleagues also deliver key targeted messages about the war in Iraq to specific constituencies.
Was the left-leaning art house crowd one of those constituencies? Is the government hiring documentary filmmakers to propagandize the U.S. population?
Nobody involved with the film is willing to say who initially put up the money for the film or how they ended up represented by the Army's PR firm.
On November 13, as Marines stormed Fallujah, the Marines' Birthday Ball in San Francisco honored Drury for his work on Voices of Iraq, for "going back and living up to the standard of a Marine."
Eartha MelzerPermalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | CommentsRead More...
[Source: Blog Maverick]